Community Eye Service Program: Factors Associated with Delayed Presentation to A Tertiary Centre Post Community Screening
Keywords:
community eye service, delayed presentation, eye disease, ophthalmologyAbstract
Early detection and prompt treatment of eye diseases can prevent visual disability. To our knowledge, there is no published data on factors associated with delayed presentation of eye diseases in Malaysia. Our objective is to determine the proportion of patients with eye disease who had a delayed presentation to an ophthalmologist after an initial screening, as well as the factors associated with delay in seeking treatment. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with eye diseases detected during a Community Eye Survey (CES) program from September 2004 to December 2012 who were referred to the ophthalmologist in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). Delayed presentation of eye disease was defined as patients who came to the eye clinic more than six months after eye screening. Multiple logistic regression was used for analyses. A total of 434 patients who were referred to Hospital USM, Kubang Kerian were included in the study. Their mean (standard deviation) age was 55.65 (21.62) years. The majority of patients (76%) had delayed presentation of eye disease post screening. Type of ocular diseases was not associated with delayed presentation. The factors associated with delayed presentation were unemployment (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.51, 95% CI (1.36, 4.64), p<0.05) and non-hypertensive status (adjusted OR: 2.31, 95% CI (1.39, 3.84) p<0.05). As a conclusion, delayed presentation to an ophthalmologist is common among patients post community eye screening in Kelantan. Unemployment and absence of systemic diseases increased the risk of delayed presentation to a tertiary centre. Increasing public awareness might shorten the time of presentation to the eye clinic.References
Mohammadi S-F, Saeedi-Anari G, Alinia C, Ashrafi E, Daneshvar R, Sommer A. Is Screening for Glaucoma Necessary? A Policy Guide and Analysis. Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research. 2014; 9(1):pp.3-6.
Wong TY, Chong EW, Wong WL, Rosman M, Aung T, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in an urban malay population: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Arch ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2008; 126(8):pp.1091-1099.
Morales LS, Varma R, Paz SH, Lai MY, Mazhar K, et al. Self-Reported Use of Eye Care among Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(2):pp.207-215.
Melese M, Alemayehu W, Friedlander E, Courtright P. Indirect costs associated with accessing eye care services as a barrier to service use in Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004; 9(3):pp.426-431.
Lewis K, Patel D, Yorston D, Charteris D. A Qualitative Study in the United Kingdom of Factors Influencing Attendance by Patients with Diabetes at Ophthalmic Outpatient Clinics. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007; 14(6):pp.375-380.
Vu H, Keeffe J, McCarty C, Taylor HR. Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life. BJO. 2005; 89(3):pp.360-363.
Wang X, Lamoureux E, Zheng Y, Ang M, Wong TY, et al. Health burden associated with visual impairment in Singapore: the Singapore epidemiology of eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(9):pp.1837-1842.
Orr P, Barrón Y, Schein OD, Rubin GS, West SK. Eye care utilization by older Americans: The SEE project. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106(5):pp.904-909.
Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian SV. Health care and equity in India. The Lancet. 2011; 377(9764):pp.505-515.
National Eye Surey ΙΙ (NES ΙΙ). Prevention of Avoidable Blindness 2014-2019. WHO Global action plan. MOH. Malaysia.
Hassan, Che Hashim Bin, Poverty in a Malay State in Malaysia: A Socio-Demographic Study (2011). Society of Interdisciplinary Business Research (SIBR) 2011 Conference on Interdisciplinary Business Research. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1867885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1867885.
Oduntan AO, Raliavhegwa M. An evaluation of the impact of the eye care services to the rural communities in the Mankweng Health Sub-district of the Northern Province. SAfr Optom. 2001; 60:pp.71-76.
Goh PP, Elias H, Norfariza N, Mariam I. National Eye Database--a web based surveillance system. Med J Malaysia. 2008; 63:pp.20-23.
Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J. health soc. behav. 1995:1-10.
Owsley C, McGwin G, Scilley K, Girkin CA, Phillips JM, et al. Perceived barriers to care and attitudes about vision and eye care: focus groups with older African Americans and eye care providers. Invest ophthalmol vis sci. 2006; 47(7):pp.2797-2802.
Lewallen S, Courtright P. Recognising and Reducing Barriers to Cataract Surgery. CEHJ. 2000; 13(34):pp.20-21.
Liza-Sharmini AT, Ng GF, Nor-Sharina Y, Khairil Anuar MI, Nik Azlan Z, et al. Clinical presentation, severity and progression of primary angle closure in malay and chinese patients. Med J Malaysia. 2014; 69(6):245-251.
Smith Eb, Curb JD, Hardy RJ, Hawkins CM, Tyroler HA. Clinic Attendance in the Hypertension Detection and Follow–up Program. Hypertension. 1982; 4(5):710-715.
Prevent Blindness America. Vision problems action plan: a national public health strategy 2004. Schaumburg (IL): Prevent Blindness America; 2004.
Gupta I, Dasgupta P, Sawhney M. Health of the Elderly in India. Some aspects of vulnerability. Discussion paper series No.26. Delhi, India: Institute of Economic Growth, 2001.
Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: are things really as simple as they seem? Soc. Sci. Med. 1996; 42(4):pp.617-624.
Ling N, Ling T, Bukhari SM, Yaakub A, Tajudin LS. The sick body is not associated with the sicker eye. J Clin Ophthalmol and Res. 2015; 3(3):pp.143-147.
Olusanya BA, Ashaye AO, Owoaje ET, Baiyeroju AM, Ajayi BG. Determinants of utilization of eye care services in a rural adult population of a developing country. MEAJO. 2016; 23(1):pp.96-103.
Brian G, Maher L, Ramke J, Palagyi A. Eye care in Fiji: a population-based study of use and barriers. Ophthalmic epidemiol. 2012; 19(2):pp.43-51.
Robbins I, Gordon A, Dyas J, Logan P, Gladman J. Explaining the barriers to and tensions in delivering effective healthcare in UK care homes: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(7) e003178.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
JBCS Publication Ethics
JBCS is committed to ensure the publication process follows specific academic ethics. Hence, Authors, Reviewers and Editors are required to conform to standards of ethical guidelines.
Authors
Authors should discuss objectively the significance of research work, technical detail and relevant references to enable others to replicate the experiments. JBCS do not accept fraudulent or inaccurate statements that may constitute towards unethical conduct.
Authors should ensure the originality of their works. In cases where the work and/or words of others have been used, appropriate acknowledgements should be made. JBCS do not accept plagiarism in all forms that constitute towards unethical publishing of an article.
This includes simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal. Corresponding author is responsible for the full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Reviewers
Reviewers of JBCS treat manuscripts received for review as confidential documents. Therefore, Reviewers must ensure the confidentiality and should not use privileged information and/or ideas obtained through peer review for personal advantage.
Reviews should be conducted based on academic merit and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments. In cases where selected Reviewer feels unqualified to review a manuscript, Reviewer should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process in TWO (2) weeks time from the review offer is made.
In any reasonable circumstances, Reviewers should not consider to evaluate manuscripts if they have conflicts of interest (i.e: competitive, collaborative and/or other connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions affiliated to the papers).
Editors
Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively based on their academic merit. JBCS strictly do not allow editors to use unpublished information of authors without the written consent of the author. Editors are required to take appropriate responsive actions if ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences requires authors to declare all competing interests in relation to their work. All submitted manuscripts must include a ‘competing interests section at the end of the manuscript listing all competing interests (financial and non-financial). Where authors have no competing interests, the statement should read ,The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Editors may ask for further information relating to competing interests.
Editors and reviewers are also required to declare any competing interests and will be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Competing interests may be financial or non-financial. A competing interest exists when the authors interpretation of data or presentation of information may be influenced by their personal or financial relationship with other people or organizations. Authors should disclose any financial competing interests but also any non-financial competing interests that may cause them embarrassment if they were to become public after the publication of the article.
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
All research must have been carried out within an appropriate ethical framework. If there is suspicion that work has not taken place within an appropriate ethical framework, Editors will follow the Misconduct policy and may reject the manuscript, and/or contact the author(s) institution or ethics committee. On rare occasions, if the Editor has serious concerns about the ethics of a study, the manuscript may be rejected on ethical grounds, even if approval from an ethics committee has been obtained.
Research involving human subjects, human material, or human data, must have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and must have been approved by an appropriate ethics committee. A statement detailing this, including the name of the ethics committee and the reference number where appropriate, must appear in all manuscripts reporting such research. Further information and documentation to support this should be made available to Editors on request.
Experimental research on vertebrates or any regulated invertebrates must comply with institutional, national, or international guidelines, and where available should have been approved by an appropriate ethics committee. The Basel Declaration outlines fundamental principles to adhere to when conducting research in animals and the International Council for Laboratory Animal Science (ICLAS) has also published ethical guidelines.
A statement detailing compliance with relevant guidelines (e.g. the revised Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the UK and Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe) and/or ethical approval (including the name of the ethics committee and the reference number where appropriate) must be included in the manuscript. The Editor will take account of animal welfare issues and reserves the right to reject a manuscript, especially if the research involves protocols that are inconsistent with commonly accepted norms of animal research. In rare cases, Editors may contact the ethics committee for further information.
INFORMED CONSENT
For all research involving human subjects, informed consent to participate in the study should be obtained from participants (or their parent or guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript, this includes to all manuscripts that include details, images, or videos relating to individual participants.
DATA SHARING POLICY
JBCS strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely should be available to readers. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files, in machine-readable format (such as spreadsheets rather than PDFs) whenever possible
Authors who do not wish to share their data must state that data will not be shared, and give the reason.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The JBCS retains the copyright of published manuscripts under the terms of the Copyright Transfer Agreement. However, the journal permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided permission to reuse, distribute and reproduce is obtained from the Journal's Editor and the original work is properly cited.
While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (JBCS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
